<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>ComixTALK - Latest Comments</title><link>http://comixtalk.disqus.com/</link><description>the digital edge of comics</description><atom:link href="https://comixtalk.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:27:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Back on Track</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/pear_pear/back_track#comment-801391860</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am so happy you are continuing! Thank you for your work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 09:27:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Summer Sort Of Hiatus!</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/summer_sort_hiatus#comment-597029121</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I get to make up what it is everytime I decide to post something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Thera Hugo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:20:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nominees for Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/nominees_hugo_award_best_graphic_story#comment-492190902</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The Foglios explicitly took themselves out of contention this year during their acceptance speech last year. Note that this Hugo Award category will disappear unless re-ratified at this year's World Science Fiction Convention in Chicago. This isn't a vote-by-mail or web poll or send a proxy situation: to vote on keeping (or removing) this category, you have to show up in person at the Business Meeting. All of the attending members are eligible to participate, but usually only about 100 of them do so. It's a direct democracy, and the fate of the Graphic Story Hugo is up for grabs this year in Chicago. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kevin Standlee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: OMG OOTS</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/omg_oots#comment-448457351</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Holy shnikies... and I can't even raise $2,000 to get new WAGON cards printed... I am in awe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mike the GameMaster</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pets, Bombs and Today</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/8497#comment-442712863</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello sir, Are&lt;br&gt;you ok? You have written a unique content.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you for the guidelines of. I started my&lt;br&gt;blog just 3 weeks before. Now I write consistently and try to write more good&lt;br&gt;content. I feel nice when you are recognized as I have&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;  bed bug tent&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pestmal87y</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 06:14:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Monday, December 19, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/comix_talk_monday_december_19_2011#comment-411524045</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There aren't many review sites out there - Drowemos may have mentioned half the ones that are active. You're not going to find a lot of reviews to aggregate. I thought you were talking about something that &lt;i&gt;crowdsourced&lt;/i&gt; opinions, had people vote on good or bad comics.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Morgan Wick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 04:05:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Monday, December 19, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/comix_talk_monday_december_19_2011#comment-390130824</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are review blogs --- not at like Rotten Tomatoes or MetaCritic which are sites that aggregate all (or at least a lot of) reviews into some kind of average score. The idea is to get a broader sense than just one critic's review of something.  I don't think it exists for comics let alone webcomics but it' a big web.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xerexes</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 16:14:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Monday, December 19, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/comix_talk_monday_december_19_2011#comment-390093805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As for a Meta Critic site for webcomics there is &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tangents.us/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.tangents.us/"&gt;http://www.tangents.us/&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://webcomicoverlook.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://webcomicoverlook.com/"&gt;http://webcomicoverlook.com/&lt;/a&gt;.  There used to be more but they sort of died off.  The problem is that when you are critiquing something someone put up on the web for free its hard to say anything negative without coming off as a bit of a douche.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's free content that is visual so it's doesn't even take much time to decide you don't like it and simply move on to something else. How mean can you be to someone for wasting 45 seconds on something that they obviously care a lot about and cost you nothing?  In general with webcomic critiques you end up with something that is either overly nice, academic and boring or makes the reviewer seem like a horrible human being that you would like to punch, a lot, in the face and groin, focusing mostly on the groin.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Drowemos</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:25:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of Reading Webcomics</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/state_reading_webcomics#comment-359318103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I get my webcomics through rss feed in windows live mail. It sorts feeds by their sources so they are highly organized. I mean, what can be better than having all of your e-mail, news and webcomics all in one place!? It's like reading the newspaper, only there's so much content specialized specifically to make my life much more efficient! If you haven't sorted it out, I would highly recommend it. The only issue is it may take quite a bit of effort in order to set up...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">b0mberman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:27:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of Reading Webcomics</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/state_reading_webcomics#comment-353152915</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Second that. Piperka first, RSS second - and only when the comic isn't listed with Piperka.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No, wait: Twitter and Facebook come in second. Rss has dropped below that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Haven't tried Ink Outbreak yet, but it sounds interesting. Never heard of Comic Domination. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max Vaehling</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:21:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Tuesday, October 18, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/comix_talk_tuesday_october_18_2011#comment-340348962</link><description>&lt;p&gt;J-Pop Talk Show is always fun. I'd love to see that The Walking Dead Season 2 premiere you are talking about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kerby | postcard printing</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 21:58:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amulet 4: The Last Council by Kazu Kibuishi</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30994#comment-340195559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i loved everything of this book! the book extremely awesome! and u have a little mistake up there. it's Leon Redbeard not Redbone.. NICCCE!!!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Caroline Lee</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:59:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of Reading Webcomics</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/state_reading_webcomics#comment-332694595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;re: Piperka.&lt;br&gt;Pahula has indicated on the &lt;a href="http://piperka.net/blog" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://piperka.net/blog"&gt;Piperka blog&lt;/a&gt; that he's been rethinking the tagging system.&lt;br&gt;Though it could definitely be improved on the finding new stuff front, on the keeping track front it's still the best option I've found.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alexis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 11:14:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Tuesday, October 4, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/comix_talk_tuesday_october_4_2011#comment-326772567</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Man thanks for "props", Xaviar, dated though they are.  :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean Kleefeld</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 20:44:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Wacom Inkling Replace the Scanner?</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30995#comment-304082127</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I had the same idea because I'm also looking for a scanner, for similarly stupid compatibility reasons. (And that was it for me and Epson.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I don't think it'll replace the scanner, though, at least not for me; I scan all kinds of things from inked art and sketches to photographs and things like pieces of cardboard and my chopping board for structure templates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How useful the inkling is going to be will depend on how we fit it into the workflow. I don't see it in my usual workflow yet, but I can already think of new things to do with it. Stuff that I have to find clumsy workarounds for now. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max Vaehling</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#039;s a Month for Conventions</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30997#comment-303539358</link><description>&lt;p&gt;SPX and Intervention are my favorite cons of the year. First, they are both within driving distance (or a short ride on my new favorite conveyance, Amtrak) and I count them as my local conventions. Second, the vibe at these cons is so different from the big, media heavy conventions. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You really get a chance to meet and interact with guests at these conventions and as a creator/guest it is such a blast for me to meet readers (and potential readers). &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plus, as a life-long Herriman fan, the only professional award I've ever wanted as an adult is the Ignatz. Someday that brick will be on my shelf.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tovias</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 10:40:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will Wacom Inkling Replace the Scanner?</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30995#comment-302210952</link><description>&lt;p&gt;the drawings look nice and all, but some folks still like the look of drawings on dead trees. Personally, I prefer using the tablet I use for my sketching and artwork....and the occasional art pad or clipboard of paper. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DumokDuvalles</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 07:37:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Adventures with the ComixTALK mailbag</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30984#comment-301391175</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the mention Xavier! I agree with you wholeheartedly about the quotes. You made some interesting suggestions which I'll certainly keep in mind the next time I send out a PR. I appreciate the shout-out and the link!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Stokes</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 18:37:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amulet 4: The Last Council by Kazu Kibuishi</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30994#comment-297579586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My five year old absolutely loves these books, and I'm happy to read them with her over and over.  But they were definitely a concern for the darker matter at the beginning but it was fine.  I'm hoping #4 is something that she can still enjoy.  Luckily I read them first and if Emily dies we'll be sticking with the first three until she's a bit older...at least 6.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn Granger</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 01:42:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Monday, August 22, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30987#comment-293090163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the shout out on Welcome To The Jungle©. I really appreciate the added exposure. You are correct the newspapers online presence was recently hacked into and pretty much nothing was salvageable. The powers that be are working on getting that put back online as soon as possible.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MJ</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pear-Pear Site Design Changes</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30983#comment-288373559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm always half flippin out when I see that there is a new pear-pear. Can't wait for the double 0.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tinf</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pear-Pear Site Design Changes</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30983#comment-283548079</link><description>&lt;p&gt;on the archives page maybe you could add a title attribute to the images with a title of the comic it links to?  That may go against the philospophy of the comic but I found the archives page a bit intimidating -- didn't know where to click.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-x&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xerexes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 12:29:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pear-Pear Site Design Changes</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30983#comment-281703622</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for checking it out! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pear-pear</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 22:12:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pear-Pear Site Design Changes</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30983#comment-279863562</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is fabulous!  Congrats on the new workspace~ I'm thrilled to see the new pages- new pear-pear is such a treat.  (The archives have a great feel to them, by the by)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elise W</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 15:43:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comix Talk for Tuesday, July 26, 2011</title><link>http://comixtalk.com/node/30979#comment-266034703</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We didn't announce a movie development deal, we announced the director of the movie: &lt;a href="http://www.deadline.com/2011/07/comic-con-simon-hunter-helms-last-blood/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.deadline.com/2011/07/comic-con-simon-hunter-helms-last-blood/"&gt;http://www.deadline.com/201...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The script is done, the director is hired, the movie's scheduled to shoot this spring.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(COWBOYS &amp;amp; ALIENS started as one single illustration.  That's what they based the screenplay on.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Crosby</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>